Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Posts


        I want to point out that the  C compiler is still a

work in progress ,and for this product to come of age and

compete against  the good compilers out there, then I feel

that there is still lots of work needed to improve this


The Competitor would love to see this compiler suffer and

remains lame too long ,so as to drive us away to other    

compilers. C++ should be work on only when the author

have time to spare.

LOOK : Horse story ........... by my wife

              > Horse have 4 legs

              > Horse run race

              > Horse legs goes East,West,North,South.

              > Horse never ......well you know.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Pavel

Since I keep getting mails about c2c vs c2c++ compiler priorities below are some clarifications.


The C2C++ compiler was created about two+ years ago.

I just took it from my archives and applied the same changes I did recently for the c2c compiler (it was easy since they both share the same code base).


I also support and extend the c2c compiler and work on a new c compiler which will be much more feature rich and flexible than c2c (and I'm still looking for 1 or 2 people who want to join this project, look into this thread).




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...